Build coverage by package and scope

List each bid package and its material subscopes. Record invited bidders, acknowledgment, intent to bid, current proposal status, and known coverage limits.

Count a bidder only after confirming interest in the actual package and document set. Connect the map to the subcontractor bid list so contact activity and coverage status use the same package identity.

Read quality as well as count

Three interested bidders do not create strong coverage if all exclude the same critical scope. Flag packages with missing interfaces, unconfirmed capacity, late questions, incomplete addendum acknowledgment, or proposals that cannot be leveled.

Keep commercial sensitivity out of broadly shared views. AGC provides construction industry resources, but project teams must judge bidder suitability and procurement requirements using their own approved process.

Trade coverage signals
SignalMeaning
StrongComparable confirmed proposals
WatchLimited or qualified interest
WeakNo dependable price coverage
ClosedReviewed and accepted treatment

Assign a response to weak coverage

For each weak package, choose an action: clarify scope, invite qualified bidders, split or combine packages, seek self-perform input, create a supported allowance, or escalate schedule risk. Give the action an owner and cutoff time.

Feed received proposals into the bid leveling process. Preserve the final heat map with the estimate so reviewers can see where pricing relied on competition, a single source, or an estimating allowance.

Frequently asked questions

Does three invitations mean strong coverage?

No. Confirm intent, scope fit, and proposal comparability.

What should happen when coverage is weak?

Assign a specific procurement or estimate action with an owner and cutoff.

Why retain the final heat map?

It shows the pricing evidence and uncertainty behind each trade package.

Subcontractor ManagementConstruction EstimatingCost Support